Bullyingwarrior would like to have open transparency to expose the corruption in the NMUSD, under the past Superintendent, Jeffrey Hubbard and his current Assistant Superintendent and Board Members the SUPPORT UNLAWFUL ACTS TO CHILDREN, FAMILIES, GOOD TEACHERS AND OTHER WHEN COMING FORWARD IN THEIR COMPLAINT AND CLAIM PROCESS.

NMUSD COMMUNITY NEEDS YOUR SUPPORT AND THE NEPOTISM THAT WAS GOING ON DURING THIS TIME WAS BEING DISCUSSED IN TESTIMONY, MAY 2011 BY KATHY CARROLL, ATTORNEY WHO LOST HER JOB, HEALTH INSURANCE, AND COMPROMISED HER OWN HEALTH AS A HEART TRANSPLANT SURVIVER.

KATHY IS A HERO AND CRUSADER AND CAN BE SEEN ON YOUTUBE: BULLYINGWARRIOR FAVORITES No. 18 and watch 17 with Ms. Ketchum and date order of the experience of Kimberly Mimms speaking 1st time on June 14, 2011 encouraged by Dept. of Education to go speak with Board and they would help stop the retaliation to her child and family after reporting back on 2-4-11 confidentially to Principal at Newport Heights Elementary School that her child's 5th grade Teacher was bringing her baby/toddler into her classroom while teaching her class for MONTHS.

IMMEDIATE RETALIATION FOLLOWED WHERAS IT BECAME UNSAFE IN CLASSROOM FOR CHILD, UNEQUAL AND INHUMANE TREATMENT TO CHILD, SUPPORTED BY NOW PAST PRINCIPAL PROMOTED TO SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE UNDER SUSAN ASTARITA, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT WHO MONTHS LATER CREATED HER OWN NEW SCHOOL POLICY UNHEARD OF IN DEPT. OF EDUCATION ON 9-11-11, that now it was more beneficial for the Teacher to bring her child on campus than it was for the Teacher to miss school, or something to this effect, after denying claim.
---------------------------------------------------

  Newport - Mesa Unified School District




 
Aug 30, 2011 : Regular Meeting of the Board of Education  : 14. CONSENT - BUSINESS SERVICES
j. Reject Claim No. 11-MIM020411  
[Status: Ready to publish]    [Consent]    



   

Recommendation
It is recommended that the Board of Education reject in whole, Claim No. 11-MIM020411.

Budget Impact
Not applicable.

Background
Claimant alleges retaliation and discrimination for reporting Teacher actions to the Principal. The District disputes this allegation.

Current Consideration
It is recommended the Board of Education reject Claim No. 11-MIM020411 in whole to protect the statute of limitations associated with future legal action.

Approved by
Jeffrey C. Hubbard, Ed.D.
Superintendent

Submitted by
Paul H. Reed
Deputy Superintendent and Chief Business Official
---------------------------------------------------

This was all known for months in advance thru email that were already sent to Susan back on 3-30-11. The question is why did she not just create the new school policy then, even though it is UNHEARD OF IN ANY SCHOOL POLICY FROM CA. ACROSS THE UNITED STATES.

WHY PUT A CHILD AND FAMILY THRU MONTHS OF DEVASTATING TREATMENT, NOT GIVING GRADES CHILD DESERVED, HUMILIATION BY DEMEANING WORDS, ACTIONS, FALSE BLAME, CANCEL NUMEROUS TESTS ON THIS CHILD ONLY, SOMETIMES SKIPPING LUNCH OR MADE TO SIT IN FRONT OFFICE IN CHAIR WITH NO DESK, KNOWING CHILD HAD TEMPORARY HEALTH INJURIES CAUSING AND INFLICTING MORE PAIN. TEACHER BULLIED CHILD, PRINCIPAL AT THAT TIME JOINED IN ON UNLAW ACTIONS TO CHILD AND FAMILY, SUPPORTED NOT GIVING AN EQUAL EDUCATION, DELIBERATELY WITHHOLDING IMPORTANT SCHOOLWORK GIVEN TO CLASS, NOT GIVING CHILD WORK WHEN SHE WAS NOT EVEN IN CLASS AND SCOLDED HER IN FRONT OF CLASS ON NUMEROUS OCCASIONS STATING ON ONE INSTANCE "LOOK WITH YOUR EYES". HOW COULD A CHILD LOOK FOR A PAPER SHE NEVER RECEIVED IN THE FIRST PLACE, MEETING AFTER MEETING WITH A PRIVATE TUTOR, WITNESSING AND SUPPORTING FAMILY ONLY TO RECEIVE THE TOOLS NEEDED FOR THE CHILD'S EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS.

IT BECAME AN UPHILL BATTLE TO ACHIEVE THIS AND CHANGED THE WORLD AS THE PARENT, CHILD, OTHERS LOOKING IN ONCE KNEW IT. THE POWER AND BULLYING FROM TOP SCHOOL OFFICIALS LEAVE A PARENT AND CHILD POWERLESS AND HELPLESS WHEN YOU GO UP THE CHAIN OF COMMAND AND REALIZE THERE IS NOBODY TO HELP YOU.

IT WAS SHATTERING ENOUGH FOR THIS FAMILY, OTHER FAMILY;S IN PAST MRS. KETCHUM FAMILY, TEACHER'S WE LOST OR THAT WERE TOO AFRAID TO STEP IN TO HELP.

KIMBERLY MIMMS HAS INVESTIGATED A SPAN OF OVER 20 YEARS OF THIS TYPE OF UNLAWFUL BEHAVIOR FROM THE NMUSD AND SOME OF THE SAME BOARD MEMBERS DESTROYING CHILDREN'S LIVES, FAMILIES FOREVER CHANGED, TEACHERS THAT LEAVE THEIR PROFESSION NEVER TO TEACH AGAIN AND KATHY CARROLL SHARING THE CONNECTION AND MISUSE OF HIRING PRACTICES OF EMPLOYING FAMILY AND FRIENDS WITHIN SCHOOL SYSTEMS.

A WITNESS CAME FORWARD AND STATED THE PRINCIPAL'S MOM HAD WORKED AT THE NMUSD AND WAS GOOD FRIENDS WITH BONNIE SWANN AND SUSAN ASTARITA.

INTERESTING TO NOTE THAT THE PRINCIPAL WAS PROMOTED IN JUNE 2011, ANNOUNCED TO THE ENTIRE SCHOOL WHEN IN FACT, KIMBERLY AND HER FAMILY WERE GOING THRU SUCH A DANGEROUS AND TRAUMATIC EXPERIENCE WITH THIS PRINCIPAL AND A TEACHER TOO!

THE REAL QUESTION TO MANY NMUSD COMMUNITY MEMBERS, OTHER PARENTS, TEACHERS, STAFF IS WHY THE PRINCIPAL SIMPLY DID NOT DO HIS JOB AND TELL THE TEACHER NOT TO BRING HER CHILD ONTO CAMPUS AND INTO THE CLASSROOM AND STOP THE UNLAWFUL ACTIONS TO KIMBERLY'S CHILD.....AND OTHERS.......

IT BECAME SO FRIGHTENING WHEN KIMBERLY DROPPED HER CHILD OFF AT SCHOOL THAT SHE DID NOT KNOW WHAT NEXT THESE SCHOOL OFFICIALS WOULD DO TO HER CHILD NEXT, SUPPORTED FULLY BY DISTRICT AND SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE EMPLOYEE'S WITH THE UNLAWFUL TREATMENT DONE TO THIS FAMILY!

 IT WAS NOT SURPRISING THAT NOW THIS PRINCIPAL WAS REPLACING BONNIE SWANN'S POSITION, WHO APPEARED TO SUDDENLY RETIRE EARLY. IT SEEMED UNUSUAL BECAUSE NOTHING WAS ON RECORD ABOUT HER RETIRING WHEN VARIOUS COMMUNITY MEMBERS WENT BACK TO LOOK ON THE AGENDA APPROVING THIS BY BOARD. THIS INFORMATION IS ONLY SPECULATED AT THIS POINT. HOWEVER, THE CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION GIVEN BY KIMBERLY AND OTHERS WHO ENTRUSTED KIMBERLY WITH TREATMENT TO THEIR CHILD, FAMILY, OR TEACHING EXPERIENCE DID NOTHING TO HELP PROTECT HER FAMILY AND THE VOICES OF OTHERS KIMBERLY WAS SPEAKING OUT FOR WHO WERE TOO AFRAID TO COME FOWARD.
THESE GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES SIMPLY LOOKED THE OTHER WAY AND REFUSED TO DO THEIR JOBS. IT ONLY WENT FULL CIRCLE TO EACH OF THEM TO SUPPORT ONE ANOTHER'S UNLAWFUL ACTIONS AND THE SCHOOL VIOLATIONS AND POLICIES THEY WERE BREAKING.

KIMBERLY MIMMS HAS WORKED HARD TO EXPOSE AND STOP THE POWER OF THE DISTRICT'S SECRET CLUB TO STAND BEHIND EACH OTHER AND NOT THEIR NMUSD COMMUNITY, CHILDREN, GOOD TEACHERS AND OTHERS. THE PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR CONTINUED EVEN BACK TO HER OWN CHILD IN 2ND GRADE BROUGHT OUT IN THE BOARD MEETING ON
DECEMBER 13, 2011 AND KIMBERLY, ANOTHER PARENT, GOOD TEACHER AND TEACHERS FEDERATION EMPLOYEE WERE EDITED OUT AND WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC EYE AT THE LAST MEETING OF JEFFREY HUBBARD, NOW PAST AND CONVICTED SUPERINTENDENT. THE REAL STORY UNDER JEFFREY WAS  HE AND MANY OF HIS STAFF, INCLUDING PAUL REED, BOARD MEMBERS COVERED UP FOR EACH OTHER BREAKING THE TRUST OF THE PUBLIC AND TRYING TO INSTILL FEAR AND THINK THEY ARE ABOVE THE LAW TO HURT THEIR COMMUNITY.

WHEN KIMBERLY CALLED DISTRICT TO INFORM THEM THAT THE PUBLIC INPUT WAS EDITED OUT THEY STATED THEY WOULD LOOK INTO IT. THE CONCLUSIONS WERE WITHHOLDING THE DVD TO PUBLIC BEFORE, DURING AND AFTER THE TRIAL OF JEFFREY HUBBARD IN CRIMINAL COURT IN LA. THE REAL STORY WAS NOT KEEPING OUR NMUSD SAFE UNDER JEFFREY HUBBRARD, BUT THE MEASURES MANY TOP SCHOOL OFFICIALS TOOK IN PROTECTING EACH OTHER IN THEIR OWN SECRET CLUB.

ADDITIONALLY, THE DVD BOARD MEETING AT NMUSD ON 12-13-11, WAS STATED BY SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE (WHEN IT FINALLY CAME OUT WITH THE "CORRECTED VERSION" STATED ON WEBSITE BRIEFLY THEN TAKEN OFF), THAT THE ORIGINAL COPY HAD BEEN DESTROYED WHEN KIMBERLY ASKED FOR THAT COPY. KIMBERLY HAD ALREADY BEEN GIVEN A COPY THAT WAS JUST FINE DURING THIS TIME AND IT WAS ALREADY OUT ON YOUTUBE AND HANDED OUT TO PEOPLE IN THE JANUARY BOARD MEETING. MRS. KETCHUM SPOKE AT THIS MEETING AND WAS GIVEN THE COPY AND OTHERS.

THE MOST INTRIGUING PART OF THIS STORY IS THAT SHERRI IN SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE IN OCTOBER 2012, STATED THAT THE COPY WAS 'BROKEN', WHEN KIMBERLY BROUGHT OUT IN VARIOUS BOARD MEETINGS THAT IT APPEARED TO HER AND MANY OTHERS THAT THEY VIOLATED THE BROWN ACT. IN FACT ANOTHER CLAIM WITH EVIDENCE WAS GIVEN TO DISTRICT NAMING JEFFREY HUBBARD, SUSAN ASTARITA AND OTHERS THAT SEEMED TO JUST GET SWEPT TO THE SIDE AND NO WRITTEN LETTERS WERE SENT DENYING THIS CLAIM. ALTHOUGH BRIEFLY IT WAS ON RECORD WITH NOW SUSAN ASTARITA AND KIRT SUHR, DENYING CLAIM AND MONTHS LATER CHANGED WITH NOW APPROVED BY REED/TRDER/KIKER.

IT WAS STATED IN MEETING BY DR. BROOKS AFTER THE MEETING IN JANUARY AND MRS. KETCHUM SPEAKING WITH MR. BROOKS INSIDE MEETING AND THEN CONTINUING SPEAKING OUTSIDE IN PARKING AREA. DR. BROOKS SAID MRS. MIMMS STORY DID NOT MAKE SENSE SHE REPLIED WHY WOULD IT NOT WITH ALL EVIDENCE SUBMITTED WITH THE CLAIM AND COMPLAINTS. FURTHER HE SAID THAT SOMEONE SEPARATED THE PAPERWORK WITH THE EVIDENCE AND KIMBERLY THEN OFFERED TO GIVE HIM ANOTHER CLAIM PACKAGE IN HER CAR AND HER REFUSED. KIMBERLY WAS SHOCKED THAT NOBODY WOULD TAKE THE COPIES AND SOMEONE AT THE DISTRICT WAS HIDING HER EVIDENCE TO SUPPORT THE CLAIM.

I WOULD THINK THIS IS FRAUD AND WHY WOULD THEY ENDANGER A CHILD'S SAFETY, NOT PROVIDE A SAFE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT AND PROVIDE EQUAL AND PROPER SCHOOL TOOLS FOR THE EDUCATIONAL SUCCESS OF KIMBERLY CHILD?

 THE 1ST CLAIM HAD ADDITIONALLY BEEN HAND DELIVERED TO KATRINA FOLLEY OFF SITE BEFORE CHRISTMAS 2011. ONE OF THESE OCCASIONS WAS LAST YEAR AT KATRINA'S FUNDRAISER AT A RESTAURANT.
IT WAS HAND DELIVERED BY KIMBERLY AND HER CHILD ASKING FOR HELP FROM KATRINA AND SHE MET HER CHILD. IRONICALLY, THE CHILD FELT SHE WOULD NOT HELP EITHER, BUT THE FAMILY WAS STILL HOPEFUL THAT SHE WOULD STEP IN ANYWAY.

ANOTHER TIME WAS AT KIMBERLY'S HOME WHEN KATRINA IRONICALLY CAME IN FRONT OF HER HOME WITH A FIRETRUCK DELIVERING GIFTS TO A FAMILY IN HER NEIGHBORHOOD. KATRINA AGAIN TOOK COMPLETE PACKAGE,  ALTHOUGH KIMBERLY WROTE ADDING JEFFREY HUBBARD AND SUSAN ASTARITA ON FRONT COVER OF THIS PAPERWORK, ON A CLAIM PAPER ALREADY SUBMITTED.

IT IS EVIDENT TO KIMBERLY AND COMMUNITY MEMBERS THAT SOMETHING IS WRONG WITH THE DUE PROCESS OF HANDLING CLAIMS AND COMPLAINTS PROPERLY, LAWFULLY, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, COVERING UP NOT ONLY FRAUD, BUT WITHHOLDING EVIDENCE FROM BOARD MEMBERS EVEN THOUGH THEY HAD THE COPIES ALL ALONG THRU KATRINA . ADDITIONALLY, IN A BOARD MEETING THEY WERE LEFT AT THE PODIUM FOR EACH BOARD MEMBER, SUPERINTENDENT AT THE MEETING ON FEBRUARY 2012. KIMBERLY LEFT IT AT PODIUM BECAUSE THEY REFUSED TO TAKE IT WHEN ASKED.

COMMUNITY MEMBERS WANT TO KNOW WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THE PAPERWORK WITH COMPLAINT AND CLAIMS THAT WERE SUBMITTED BACK ON THIS DAY TOO!

THE CONCLUSION IS THE BOARD, SUPERINTENDENTS, PAST AND CURRENT, AND OTHERS  NOT ONLY DIDN'T DO THEIR JOB WITH THE SCHOOL POLICIES GOVERNED BY LAW, THEIR DISTRICT, BUT NEW POLICIES WERE CREATED THAT WERE AGAINST ALL THESE SCHOOL POLICIES IN THE FIRST PLACE.
IN FACT, IT WAS EVIDENT THESE PEOPLE WENT TO GREAT MEASURES CHOOSING TO NOT DO ANYTHING TO HELP.

WHAT THEY DID DO WAS SOME OF THE SUGGESTIONS KIMBERLY GAVE THEM IN BOARD MEETINGS THEY DID PUT INTO PLACE WITH BULLYING PROCEDURES, BRINGING THE BULLYING MOVIE TO LIDO ISLAND RECENTLY, OPEN A COMPLAINT AREA ON LINE FOR BULLYING. KIMBERLY AND OTHERS FEEL IT SHOULD BE REGULATED INCLUDING THE COMPLAINTS AND CLAIMS TO A NON BIAS AGENCY, LIKE THE DEPT. OF JUSTICE WHERE IT WOULD BE TREATED FAIRLY AND ACTED UPON IMMEDIATELY UNDER OUR LAW AND SCHOOL POLICIES.

HOW COULD A SYSTEM SET UP TO HELP ANYONE COMING FORWARD NOT PROTECT A CHILD, FAMILY AND NOT ASSIST THEM AND OTHERS KIMBERLY WAS SPEAKING OUT FOR INCLUDING PAST AND CURRENT TEACHERS, OTHERS CHILDREN AND FAMILIES. THERE DENIAL STATE IT NEVER HAPPENED, WITH EVIDENCE SUBMITTED NUMEROUS TIMES AND THE CLAIMS/COMPLAINTS SEEM TO DISAPPEAR, JUST LIKE THEY DID BACK IN 2ND GRADE BROUGHT OUT IN MEETING WITHHELD FROM PUBLIC ON 12-13-11. KIMBERLY SERVED A VERBAL COMPLAINT ON JEFFREY HUBBARD AND WALT DAVENPORT NOT KEEPING HER CHILD SAFE AT THEIR DISTRICT AND BROUGHT OUT THE PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR DEALING WITH THEM IN THE PAST.

MOST IMPORTANT FACT, IS THAT THOSE COMPLAINTS DISAPPEARED AND WHO DO YOU THINK KIMBERLY DEALT WITH BACK THEN?

BONNIE SWANN, SUSAN ASTARITA AND JEFFREY HUBBARD WITH NUMEROUS PHONE CALLS, COUNTLESS EMAILS THAT DISAPPEARED LIKE IT NEVER HAPPENED AT ALL YEARS AGO.
WHEN BONNIE SWANN RETURNED CALL FOR SUSAN ASTARITA ON 3/30/11 LEFT ON VM, NOT ONLY WAS IT SHOCKING, BUT IN A PHONE CALL BONNIE MADE IT QUITE CLEAR THAT SHE KNEW WHO FAMILY WAS FROM YEARS AGO OVERSTEPPING HER POSITION, FEELING INTIMIDATED AT THAT TIME. WHY DID SHE NOT JUST ASSIST FAMILY UNDER THE PROTECTION OF THE DISTRICT? BONNIE ALSO CONFIRMED IT IS AGAINST SCHOOL POLICY FOR A TEACHER TO BRING A BABY/TODDLER INTO HER CLASS OR ON CAMPUS WHILE TEACHING HER CLASS. THE TEACHER STILL DID AND THE PRINCIPAL STILL ALLOWED IT EVEN AFTER SPEAKING WITH BONNIE.

KIMBERLY WAS HOPEFUL THAT THE OUTCOME WOULD NOT BE LIKE IT WAS IN THE PAST, ESPECIALLY SINCE HER FAMILY DOCTOR SAID TO TAKE HER OUT OF THE NMUSD IN 2ND GRADE BECAUSE IT WAS UNSAFE. EVEN A LETTER WRITTEN BY DOCTOR SUPPORTING FAMILY THEN WAS TAKEN OUT OF CHILD'S FILE, BECAUSE IT WAS CLEAR TO FAMILY DOCTOR THE DISTRICT BACK THEN WAS WORKING AGAINST THE FAMILY AND TWISTED THE DOCTOR'S OWN WORDS THAT SHE PUT IT IN WRITING GIVEN TO THE DISTRICT. (IT WAS TURNED IN RECENTLY IN THE LAST CLAIM AGAINST JEFFREY HUBBARD AND OTHERS ASKING FOR EXPLANATIONS AND TO INCLUDE EACH TIME KIMBERLY SPOKE AT THE BOARD MEETINGS ASKING FOR HELP, INCLUDING THIS AS EVIDENCE TOO.

WHAT HAPPENED TO ALL THE WITNESSES LISTED IN THE 1ST CLAIM WILLING TO TESTIFY AND SPEAK FOR KIMBERLY AND HER FAMILY.  THESE WITNESSES WANTED TO SHARE THEIR OWN TRAGEDIES AND UNLAWFUL CONDUCT IN THEIR JOB POSITIONS, CHILD ATTENDING THE SAME CLASS OF THIS ABUSIVE TEACHER AND CONFIRMING BREAKING SCHOOL POLICIES , WITH TEACHER ALLOWED TO BRING HER CHILD INTO CLASS WHILE TEACHING AND CONDUCT TO THEIR OWN FAMILY THE DEVASTATION THIS TEACHER INSTILLED TO HER CHILD.

NOTE: THIS LETTER WAS GIVEN TO DR. BARBOW AND HAND DELIVERED IN A BOARD MEETING AS WELL AS GIVEN IN A SEPARATE MEETING AND READ IN PERSON RECORDED WITH PERMISSION FROM BECKY GOGEL WITH A WITNESS PRESENT.

REBECCA ON 3/23/12 LEFT VOICE MAIL MESSAGE TO RESUBMIT CLAIM.

IT WAS RESUBMITTED INCLUDING WHAT HAD ALREADY BEEN GIVEN WITH NAMING THESE INDIVIDUALS, TEACHER, PRINCIPAL AT THE TIME, A SECOND TEACHER WHO BULLIED CHILD SUPPORTING THE TEACHER WHO HAD LEFT KIMBERLY'S CHILD AND OTHERS AT A FIELD TRIP UNATTENDED FOR AWHILE. FALSE BLAME WAS FORCED UPON KIMBERLY'S CHILD AND A FEW OTHERS AND IT BECAME SO UNSAFE DURING THIS TIME THAT THE TEACHER HELD CHILD AGAINST THEIR WILL MAKING THEM CRY SO HYSTERICALLY THAT CHILD COULD NOT EVEN SPEAK WORDS ON THE PHONE WHEN PARENT CALLED. CHILD WAS MISSING ON CAMPUS AND TEACHER STATED "CRYING WON'T HELP YOU"?
NEIGHBORS IN AREA CAME OVER LATER THAT DAY ASKING IF CHILD WAS OKAY BECAUSE THEY WERE PAGED AFTER SCHOOL. THE TEACHER SAW THE PRIVATE TUTOR AND HEARD CHILD'S NAME PAGED AND SAID NOTHING TO TEACHER WHEN TUTOR HAD GREAT CONCERN WHERE THE CHILD WAS, SINCE SHE WAS MISSING. THE TEACHER KNEW WHAT SHE DID AND WHERE CHILD WAS AND CHOSE TO STAY SILENT AND SHE WALKED INTO THE PRINCIPALS OFFICE .

COSTA MESA AND NEWPORT BEACH POLICE WERE NOTIFIED NUMEROUS TIMES BY PHONE AND IN PERSON AT THE CM POLICE DEPT. THEY SAID A TEACHER CAN DO ANYTHING LIKE THIS TO YOUR CHILD AND HE WILL MAKE SURE THAT MR. DAVE BROOKS WOULD BE NOTIFIED I WAS THEIR. I SAID HE ALREADY KNOWS AND NOTHING HAS BEEN DONE. IT FELT
INTIMIDATING TO KIMBERLY AT THE TIME AND THE POICE OFFICER REFUSED TO HELP OR TAKE A COMPLAINT. KIMBERLY REQUESTED THAT THE CHIEF OF POICE CALL, BUT NO CALL CAME. KIMBERLY FEELS THE MESSAGE WAS NEVER GIVEN TO HIM, BUT LOST FAITH IN TRUST IN THE POLICE DEPARTMENT LIKE MRS. KETCHUM DID WHEN SHE WENT TO THE POLICE FOR HELP WITH HER DAUGHTER IN 2009 BEING THREATENED TO BE RAPED AND MURDERED BY 3 ATHLETES AT CDM.

THE QUESTION IS HOW COULD THE NMUSD WITH THE SAME PEOPLE IN CHARGE NOT DO ANYTHING TO HELP THIS FAMILY? WHY?

IN THE LAWSUIT WON BY THE KETCHUM FAMILY THE DISTRICT HAD TO RETRAIN THEIR EMPLOYEES THAT NO RETALIATION WOULD HAPPENED AGAIN OR CREATE AN UNSAFE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT, BUT THEY STILL DID OVER 2 YEARS LATER TO KIMBERLY'S FAMILY. IT IS JUST SHOCKING AND INCONCEIVABLE THAT THIS MUCH TIME HAS GONE BY STILL WITH NO BODY STEPPING IN TO HELP AND NO ACCOUNTABILITY FROM DISTRICT OR DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION.

KIMBERLY IS WORKING WITH LOCAL PAST MAYOR
GARY MONAHN , ASSEMBLYMAN MANSOOR, ASSEMBLYMAN ENG, HAS WRITTEN GOVERNOR BROWN AND MET WITH HIM BRIEFLY AND GIVEN THE CLAIMS TO DISTRICT ATTORNEY OF ORANGE COUNTY TO STEP IN TO HELP. KIMBERLY IS VERY HOPEFUL THAT THEY WILL HELP AND SUPPORT A NEW BILL INTO LAW FOR OTHERS TO BE PROTECTED.

NOTE: THE TEACHER WAS MAD BECAUSE PARENT WOULD NOT ALLOW CHILD TO SIGN A NOTE ON FALSE BLAME AND HAD SIGNED IT FOR CHILD STATING SOMETHING LIKE UNDER COUNSEL ADVISEMENT IT WAS SIGNED BY KIMBERLY UNDER DURESS, OR SOMETHING TO THIS EFFECT.
KIMBERLY HAD ALREADY HAD SEVERAL MEETINGS WITH PRINCIPAL AND SENT EMAILS THAT THIS TEACHER WOULD NOT BE ALOWED TO ACCUSE HER CHILD OF FALSE BLAME ANYMORE AND TO CALL PARENT IMMEDIATELY IF IT HAPPENED ANYMORE OR GO TO PRINCIPAL'S OFFICE TO PROTECT CHILD AT THE TIME, WHICH HE NEVER WOULD PROTECT HER CHILD AND IT ONLY GOT WORSE.

FRONT OFFICE EMPLOYEE RUNNING THE DAY CARE FOR 5TH GRADE TEACHER INCLUDED IN 1ST CLAIM AND BONNIE SWANN FROM THE SUPERINTENDENT'S OFFICE.

NOTE: WE ALSO LOST A WONDERFUL AND DEDICATED TEACHER AT THIS SAME SCHOOL BECAUSE OF THE RETALIATION DONE TO HER FROM THIS SAME PRINCIPAL.
IT BECAME UNSAFE FOR HER TO CONTINUE WORKING AT THE SCHOOL AND THE PRINCIPAL WAS CREATING FALSE BLAME WITH HER WORK AND SETTING HER UP, ALSO NOT PROTECTING THIS TEACHER FROM THE NMUSD DISTRICT.

THANK YOU IN ADVANCE FOR SUPPORTING AND STOPPING THE CRIMES AGAINST OUR NMUSD COMMUNITY, ESPECIALLY OUR CHILDREN.

OUR COMMUNITY OF NEWPORT MESA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND KIMBERLY MIMMS ARE ASKING FOR YOUR IN ANYTHING YOU CAN DO TO PREVENT THIS FROM HAPPENING TO ANYONE ELSE AND REACH OUT TO HELP HER FAMILY AND OTHERS.