NMUSD NEWS SHARED BY BULLYINGWARRIOR: KIMBERLY MIMMS AND KATHLEEN CARROLL BOTH DISCUSS CORRUPTION IN OUR PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM WITH NOT PROTECTING KIDS, FAMILIES GOOD TEACHERS AND OTHERS

BULLYINGWARRIOR HAS NOW UNCOVERED AN AMAZING HERO AND LEADER, KATHLEEN CARROLL WHO IS CHANGING THE EDUCATIONAL SYSTEM FROM HER OWN INVESTIGATION. 

KATHLEEN HAS EXPOSED THE CORRUPTION AND NEPOTISM PRACTICES OF FRAUD, COVER UPS FROM CA. TEACHERS CREDENTIALING, THE DISTRICTS, LIKE WHAT HAS HAPPENED IN NEWPORT MESA UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT AND OTHERS IN CA. AND ACROSS THE UNITED STATES AND THE PEOPLE RUNNING THEM OR SUPPORTING OUR PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM.

THE UNLAWFUL CONDUCT, PENAL CODE VIOLATIONS, SCHOOL VIOLATIONS AND MISUSING SCHOOL FUNDS IS HAPPENING MORE THAN THE PUBLIC REALIZES. WE HAVE TO TAKE CHARGE AS A NATION, GET INVOLVED, TAKE A STAND  TO STOP THE VICTIMIZATION TO OUR PRECIOUS CHILDREN, FAMILIES, GOOD TEACHERS/STAFF WHO ARE DEVASTATED FROM THE ACTIONS OF THESE INHUMANE PEOPLE RUNNING OUR PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM, SCHOOL DISTRICTS AND SCHOOLS.

CRIMINAL CHARGES NEED TO BE FILED IMMEDIATELY TO ANYONE HARMING A CHILD, FAMILY, GOOD TEACHERS AND STAFF THAT REPORT UNLAWFUL CONDUCT, PENAL CODE AND SCHOOL VIOLATIONS IN COMPLAINT AND CLAIMS THAT ARE COVERED UP OR DISAPPEAR LIKE THAT SEEM TO BE A PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR WITH NMUSD, MANY OTHER CA. SCHOOLS, AND OTHERS ACROSS OUR NATION.

KATHLEEN CARROLL RISK IT ALL BY COMING FORWARD TO SHARE HER OWN STORY, JUST LIKE KIMBERLY MIMMS HAS ON A DIFFERENT LEVEL WITH WHAT KATHLEEN TESTIFIED ABOUT IN MAY 2011. 

KIMBERLY HAS BEEN FIGHTING HARD FOR JUSTICE IN THE NEWPORT MESA UNIFIED DISTRICT FOR ALMOST 2 YEARS, FOR HER OWN FAMILY AND COUNTLESS OTHERS.

THE RETALIATION AND FEAR KIMBERLY HAS TALKED ABOUT TO HER OWN FAMILY, OTHER FAMILIES, GOOD TEACHERS AND OTHERS,  THAT ALSO EXPERIENCED INHUMANE TREATMENT BY THE NMUSD DISTRICT, SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE AND TREATMENT OF SPECIFIC STAFF AT THE NEWPORT HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL COVERING UP SCHOOL VIOLATIONS FOR EACH OTHER. 

KIMBERLY WAS FIGHTING HARD FOR EVEN KATHLEEN CARROLL WHEN SHE RECENTLY LEARNED OF HER STORY THAT IS UNDER THE FOLLOWING WEBSITE:

“BULLYINGWARRIOR FAVORITES” CLICK #19 AND UNDER YOUTUBE: BULLLYINGWARRIOR  AND DISCUSSED UNDER
BULLYINGWARRIOR.BLOGSPOT.COM

KIMBERLY SPOKE AT RECENT NMUSD BOARD MEETINGS AND NEWPORT BEACH AND COSTA MESA COUNSEL MEETINGS IN NOVEMBER AND DECEMBER 2012 TO HELP EDUCATE PEOPLE ABOUT KATHLEEN CARROLL BEING A LEADER, HERO IN OUR PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM AND THE FEAR, NEPOTISM AND CORRUPTION THAT NEEDS TO CHANGE IN STATE AND FEDERAL LAWS.

KIMBERLY HAS DISCUSSED IN NUMEROUS MEETINGS AT NMUSD BOARD MEETINGS SINCE JUNE 14, 2011 WHEN DEPT. OF EDUCATION IN SACRAMENTO TOLD HER BY PHONE TO GO AND THE BOARD WOULD HELP HER FAMILY WHICH HAS NEVER HAPPENED TO THIS DAY.

KIMBERLY HAS SHARED THAT MANY PEOPLE, INCLUDING TEACHERS HAVE A VOICE THRU HER THAT WERE “TOO AFRAID AND FEARFUL OF RETALIATION, WITH THE PUBLIC SCHOOLS AND DISTRICT COULD EFFECT STUDENT FILES DELIBERATELY BEING THE GATE KEEPER OF THESE FILES OR HURT A TEACHER OR STAFF MEMBERS CAREER OR POSITION IF THEY CROSSED THEM OR DID NOT STAY SILENT. 

NMUSD COMMUNITY AND OTHER PEOPLE UNDERSTAND WHY PEOPLE WERE FRIGHTENED TO COME FORWARD BECAUSE OF THE POWER BEHIND THE DISTRICT, SPECIFIC UNLAWFUL EMPLOYEES, WHO BROKE SCHOOL VIOLATIONS WOULD GET PROMOTED OR REWARDED EVEN SOME UNDER THE SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE. 

SUSAN ASTARITA, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT UNDER THE DIRECTION OF JEFFREY HUBBARD BACK IN SEPT. 2011 EVEN SUPPORTED A SCHOOL POLICY CREATED THAT WAS UNHEARD OF TO THE DEPT. OF EDUCATION, ORANGE COUNTY, RECENTLY IN DECEMBER 2012, WHEN THEY CALLED KIMBERLY CONFIRMING THAT NO TEACHER OR STAFF MEMBER CAN BRING "THEIR OWN BABY/TODDLER/CHILD” ONTO CAMPUS OR INTO THE CLASSROOM WHILE TEACHING THEIR CLASS OR WORKING.

WHY DID SUPERINTENDENT, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT, PRINCIPAL AT THAT TIME AND OTHER STAFF ALLOW A 5TH GRADE TEACHER IN 2011 AT NEWPORT HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN NEWPORT BEACH, CA.TO BREAK A SCHOOL VIOLATION AND SUPPORT HARMING A CHILD WITH RETALIATION AND DO NOTHING ABOUT IT, APPEARING TO MANY THAT DISTRICT RAN A FAMILY OUT OF THEIR DISTRICT WITH FEAR AND INTIMIDATION, NOT GIVE EQUAL AND A SAFE EDUCATION TO A ELEMENTARY SCHOOL STUDENT?

HOW COULD THIS HAPPEN TO ANOTHER YOUNG VENERABLE STUDENT AND FAMILY LIKE IN THE KETCHUM CASE IN 2009?
(GOOGLE: NMUSD LAWSUIT, EVEN LOOK UNDER CORONA DEL MAR AT THE LAWSUIT FILED ABOUT SIMILAR VIOLATIONS AND PENAL CODE/SCHOOL VIOLATIONS STATED).

THE NMUSD COMMUNITY AND ESPECIALLY KIMBERLY STILL WANTS TO KNOW HOW THIS COULD HAPPEN YET AGAIN TO ANOTHER YOUNG STUDENT VICTIMIZED WITH THE WRATH AND POWER OF RETALIATION WITH NMUSD DISTRICT EMPLOYEES AND PROTECTED UNDER SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE SCHOOL OFFICIALS!

WHY WAS THIS POLICY AND OTHERS NOT SIMPLY FOLLOWED?

SUSAN ASTAITA, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT COULD HAVE SIMPLY CONFIRMED BACK TO KIMBERLY’S 1ST EMAIL SENT TO SUSAN ON MARCH 30, 2011, IN REGARDS TO KIMBERLY’S CHILD’S 5TH GRADE TEACHER WAS INDEED ALLOWED TO BRING HER BABY/TODDLER ONTO CAMPUS!

WHY WERE SPECIAL ALLOWANCES OR PRIVILEGES BEEN MADE BY DISTRICT OR NEWPORT HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL AUTHORITATIVE STAFF MEMBER IN CHARGE ALLOWING A TEACHER TO BRING HER BABY/TODDLER INTO CLASS AT ALL WHILE TEACHING OR EVEN ONTO CAMPUS KNOWING THIS WAS A CLEAR SCHOOL VIOLATION?

WHY DID THE NOW PAST PRINCIPAL DURING THAT TIME, SUPERINTENDENT OFFICE STAFF MEMBER BONNIE SWANN, NOW RETIRED, EVEN DEPT. OF EDUCATION IN SACRAMENTO STATE IT WAS NOT ALLOWED AND AGAINST THEIR SCHOOL POLICIES, EVEN STILL ALLOWING TEACHER TO DO THIS IN THE FIRST PLACE FOR MONTHS? 

ADDITIONALLY, THERE WERE SEVERAL STUDENTS, PARENTS IN THE CLASS OR OTHER FAMILIES, STAFF AND GOOD TEACHERS THAT DID NOT AGREE WITH THIS EITHER AND WHY A SCHOOL VIOLATION AND TREATMENT OF RETALIATION WAS NOT BEING STOPPED?

HOW A TEACHER COULD BE ALLOWED TO RETALIATE TO A CHILD AND FAMILY, COMPROMISE THE EDUCATION OF HER STUDENTS, BESIDES UNEQUAL TREATMENT AND EQUAL EDUCATION TO CHILD WHO’S FAMILY REPORTED THE COMPLAINT AND HUMILIATION THAT DID NOT STOP FOR MONTHS BY THIS TEACHER AND WAS NOW BEING JOINED IN WITH BULLYING FROM TOP SCHOOL OFFICIALS TO HARM THE WELL BEING AND SECURITY OF A SAFE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT. 

MANY OTHER KIDS, PARENTS, GOOD TEACHERS/STAFF OTHERS ON CAMPUS NOTICED 5TH GRADE TEACHER AND OFFICE EMPLOYEE BREAKING SCHOOL VIOLATION WHEN CHILD SOME TIMES CRIED THROUGHOUT THE CAMPUS DURING SCHOOL HOURS WHEN BROUGHT BACK AND FORTH FROM FRONT OFFICE EVEN SET UP ON CHAIR WATCHING A COMPUTER MONITOR BEHIND OFFICE AREA WHERE EMPLOYEES WORK,  AND BROUGHT BACK TO TEACHERS CLASSROOM WHILE SHE WAS TEACHING HER CLASS THAT WAS ALREADY IN SESSION MONTH AFTER MONTH!

WHY WAS THE CHILD AND FAMILY NOT PROTECTED FOR MONTHS? IT BECAME SO FRIGHTING AND DANGEROUS FOR THE CHILD THAT KIMBERLY WAS AFRAID AND VERY FEARFUL WHAT THE STAFF PROTECTING THE 5TH GRAD TEACHER AND THIS TEACHER WOULD DO NEXT TO HER CHILD. YOU CAN SEE UNDER YOUTUBE: BULLYINGWARRIOR AND BULLYINGWARRIOR FAVORITES WITH NMUSD BOARD MEETINGS DATED JUNE 14, 2011, MEETING IN OCTOBER 2011 WHEN KIMBERLY BREAKS DOWN CRYING STATING THIS ON CAMERA THAT SHE DID NOT WANT ANYONE ELSE TO DRIVE AWAY FROM A SCHOOL NOT KNOWING WHAT THE STAFF WOULD DO TO HER CHILD OR SOMEONE ELSE’S FAMILY OR SOMETHING TO THIS EFFECT.

THE REAL QUESTION IS WHY AFTER FIRST REPORTED TO PRINCIPAL CONFIDENTIALLY ON PHONE 2-4-11 AND AGAIN BY EMAIL ON 2-14-11, THEN THRU NUMEROUS EMAILS, MEETING AFTER MEETING WHEN “IMMEDIATE RETALIATION" FOLLOWED HER CHILD AND NOBODY HELPED THE FAMILY TO STOP THE UNLAWFUL TREATMENT, PENAL CODE VIOLATIONS AND DISCOUNT THE RIGHTS OF A CHILD OR PARENT?

WHY WAS THE TREATMENT OF RETALIATION NOT STOPPED THAT WAS HEAVILY DOCUMENTED BY COUNTLESS EMAILS, BUT IN FACT, IT WAS JOINED IN BY NOT ONLY 5TH GRADE TEACHER, BUT THE PRINCIPAL, CURRENTLY WORKING AT THE SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE AFTER RECEIVING PROMOTION IN JUNE 2011. 

WHY WOULD ANOTHER TEACHER SUPPORTING THE 5TH GRADE TEACHER, JOIN IN ON BULLYING A CHILD, NOW ALSO CREATE HUMILIATION, FALSE BLAME, DEGRADE CHILD WITH WORDS AND NAME CALLING AFTER A FIELD TRIP WHEN CHILD WAS LEFT UNATTENDED WITH OTHERS, TRY TO FORCE A CHILD TO SIGN A NOTE  WITH 5TH GRADE TEACHER WHEN THEY DID NOTHING WRONG, ISOLATE THEM IN HALLWAY WITH ANOTHER STUDENT, AND OVERSTEP HIS POWER TO PROTECT A TEACHER BREAKING SCHOOL VIOLATION AND MORE? KIMBERLY HAD TO TAKE HER CHILD OUT OF THIS OPTIONAL MATH CLASS TO STOP THE INTIMIDATION, BULLYING AND HUMILIATION HE WAS NOW DOING TO HER CHILD.

WHY WOULD AN OFFICE WORKER WHO RAN SPECIAL DAYCARE SERVICE WHEN SHE TOOK TEACHERS BABY/TODDLER FROM OFFICE LEAVING HER JOB AND GOING BACK TO TEACHERS CLASSROOM WITH TEACHER’S CHILD WANT TO BREAK SCHOOL VIOLATIONS? 

WHY THIS OFFICE EMPLOYEE TURN AGAINST FAMILY WHO REPORTED THE SCHOOL VIOLATIONS, COPIED ON NUMEROUS EMAILS AND SENT EMAILS ABOUT HER CONDUCT AND OTHER SCHOOL VIOLATIONS OR PENAL CODE VIOLATIONS IGNORE THEM,  BUT WOULD JOIN IN ON BULLYING, INTIMIDATE, FALSELY ACCUSE CHILD OF BEING LATE  WHEN THEY WERE NOT, WITHHOLD SCHOOL RECORDS WHEN REQUESTED, WHEN NEVER A PROBLEM OBTAINING THEM IN THE PAST, QUESTION A PARENT WANTING ANSWERS WHY THEIR CHILD WAS MISSING ON CAMPUS, HELD AGAINST THEIR WILL BY A TEACHER, BEING PAGED TO COME TO OFFICE WHEN OTHERS WERE VERY CONCERNED ABOUT THIS CHILD MISSING, TREATMENT OBSERVED TO CHILD BY TEACHER AND OTHER STAFF SEEN FOR MONTHS BY OTHER KIDS, PARENTS, TEACHERS, FAMILY TUTOR AND EVEN STUDENTS AROUND CAMPUS THAT WERE CONCERNED. 

KIMBERLY ASKED THIS OFFICE EMPLOYEE WHO HAD BEEN RUNNING DAY CARE WHY HER CHILD WAS HELD AGAINST HER WILL AND APPEARED TO BE MISSING AND HER RESPONSE WAS SOMETHING LIKE YOUR CHILD IS OLD ENOUGH TO TELL YOU WHAT HAPPENED. 
KIMBERLY STATED SOMETHING LIKE I AM ASKING YOU WHAT HAPPENED AND SHE NOT ONLY GOT NO ANSWERS, BUT IT APPEARED THAT THEY OWED KIMBERLY NO EXPLANATIONS OF THE SAFETY AND WELL BEING OF HER CHILD IN THEIR CARE OF THIS TEACHER WHO HAD BEEN KNOWN OF HER RETALIATION TO HER CHILD AT NEWPORT HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.

WHY WOULD ANY STAFF FEEL THEY HAVE NO RESPONSIBILITY, ACCOUNTABILITY  TO A STUDENT AND FAMILY OF TREATMENT OF A TEACHER WHO WAS UPSET THAT KIMBERLY COMPLAINED CONFIDENTIALLY TO PRINCIPAL OF HER BRINGING HER CHILD INTO HER CLASSROOM. THE TEACHER ALSO HAD STATED IN CLASS THAT SHE WAS UPSET WITH A PARENT IN THE CLASS WHO COMPLAINED AND HER CHILD COULD NOT COME IN THE CLASS ANYMORE WHEN SHE ANNOUNCED IT TO HER STUDENTS.  

IT IS VERY CONCERNING TO KIMBERLY AND OTHER PARENTS IN THE NMUSD BESIDES SOME CURRENT STAFF AT THE SCHOOL THAT EVEN TO THIS DAY AN OFFICE EMPLOYEE HAD NO INTENTIONS OF FINDING OUT WHAT HAPPENED AND WAS NOT RESPONSIBLE FOR ANY STAFF THAT HELD THEIR STUDENTS AFTER SCHOOL WITHOUT ANY REASON, EVEN THOUGH THIS TEACHER HAD HELD ANOTHER CHILD AFTER SCHOOL YEARS PRIOR MISSING THEIR BUS WHEN HE WAS ONLY IN 1ST OR 2ND GRADE. THE CLEAR MESSAGE TO THIS PARENT FROM THE SAME TEACHER AND SCHOOL WAS “WE ARE NOT RESPONSIBLE WHAT HAPPENS AFTER SCHOOL”, TOLD TO THEM ALSO FROM A STAFF MEMBER AT NEWPORT HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL.

WHERE IN OUR PUBLIC SCHOOL SYSTEM DOES IT SAY THAT PARENTS OR A CHILD HAVE NO RIGHTS? THIS TREATMENT IS EXACTLY WHAT KATHLEEN CARROLL WAS TALKING ABOUT AND WILL HOPEFULLY COME OUT IN HER TRIAL FILED RECENTLY, WITH A LAWSUIT PENDING.

WHY A STAFF MEMBER WOULD NOT PROTECT THEM AT SCHOOL ALL THE TIME, ESPECIALLY AFTER REPORTING RETALIATION, THAT WAS JOINED IN ON A TOPIC RARELY DISCUSSED, BULLYING FROM TOP SCHOOL OFFICIALS”, PROTECTING UNLAWFUL TREATMENT, SCHOOL VIOLATIONS AND PENAL CODES.

ANY SCHOOL EMPLOYEES VIOLATING ACTIONS SHOULD ALWAYS BE ENFORCED BY A SCHOOL DISTRICT, DEPT. OF EDUCATION AND ITS STAFF, ESPECIALLY KNOWN TREATMENT THAT CONTINUES FOR MONTHS IT SHOULD BE STOPPED AND INVESTIGATED.