Bullywarrior
Thanks CM Press for their hard work and efforts on the story with NMUSD not protecting yet again another child in their District back in 2007 at Davis.
What a story this certainly was and I wonder how the child is doing years later.
The Pattern of Behavior is most concerning on how years ago this was handled at NMUSD up to the chain of command.
Bullyingwarrior will try to get more information from Police Department or People in Community that can share anything on the outcome.
It sounds like the child that suffered back injury from being attacked from someone who was alot older. Why did this story just get swept aside?
If anyone has information on this story or others please send it to this Blog or
Facebook-Bullying TeachersandPrincipals
Twitter-Bullyingwarrior
YouTube-Bullyingwarrior
Note- the YouTube is showing Jeffrey Hubbard past Superintendent and Board not doing anything to protect another family for reporting Free child care run by front office employee for months on our tax dollars back on 2-4-11 by ph. To their now Past Principal. Additionally it was reported again in writing in email on 2-14-11, MAJOR RETAILATION IMMEDIATELY FOLLOWED.
Kimberly, Parent of Student has been fighting why The Bullying From Top School Officials never stopped on the way up the chain of command. Denying claim on 9-12-11 WITH EVIDENCE TO BACK UP THE CLAIM SUBMITTED and HAND DELIVERED to BOARD MEMBERS and DISTRICT.
YouTube is running the Public Input area that is edited out where other Parents and Devoted Teacher spoke.'the DVD was Obtained and is showing and Community is demanding why this was not released before Trial for Jeffrey Hubbard! It seems very suspicious to take it out and they stated it was computer glitch even prior acting oblivious that it was missing at all.....
Why not put it on immediately after they were informed for the public and concerned Community to watch! What were they covering up perhaps PATTERN OF BEHAVIOR twice to this family and others Parent has been fighting for to bring these families to attention of Board and others failing them too?
Parent gave verbal notice to Superintendent Jeffrey Hubbard and Walt Davenport for not keeping child and family safe in Complaint/Claim process from Retaliation and other Unlawful Conduct.
Kimberly is fighting for Justice for everyone and the People in past in NMUSD that have been devastated, like her family from the actions of these Government Workers.
Teacher was bringing her baby to school and into her 5th grade classroom month after month.at Newport Heights Elementary School in Newport Beach, CA.
THURSDAY, MARCH 22, 2007
----------------------------------------------------
THURSDAY, MARCH 22, 2007
CM PRESS # 110
ASSAULT ON DAVIS CAMPUS
The CM PRESS received a report yesterday (3/21) that a fifth or sixth grader on the Davis School campus was the victim of an unprovoked assault by at least three older, and bigger, High School students who appeared to have entered the campus from Costa Mesa High School and who, for no reason, attacked the younger and smaller kid and left him on the ground. Davis is a 4th grade to 6th grade school so the kids there are from about 9 to 12 years old.
The incident is reported to have happened between about 2:50 and 3:00 p.m. when school was out and the City of Costa Mesa was running its after school program on the campus.
Information is sketchy and the CM PRESS seems to be getting a run-a-round from authorities, but it appears that the attackers have not been apprehended.
At this time, the CM PRESS does not know if the attackers were gang members or not, but we do know that Davis School has often had gang graffiti painted on the buildings and that this graffiti is quickly painted over by staff.
We are also concerned that the so-called intervention (as opposed to enforcement) strategy of some in local government and the NMUSD may be putting kids in danger because the interventionists may want to hide or downplay the reality of assaults and gang activity in order to calm fears of parents while at the same time furthering the interventionists' incorrect strategy of looking the other way when "minor assaults" and crimes take place so that the interventionists can befriend gang members, instead of having them arrested, in order to try to talk them out of being in gangs.
Our feeling that someone may be trying to cover this up wasn't assuaged when, as we were gathering information on this story, one official apparently tried to just have us go away by giving us an oil on troubled waters statement that the school was aware of the incident and that it was all taken care of (read, "It was no big deal. Hardly worth talking about").
When we persisted in our questions and demanded that we be told what was actually done, we were put on hold. The same person then came back on the line a few minutes later and told us that the "incident was under investigation." So, which is it? Is it no big deal or a big deal that requires investigation? Your guess is as good as ours.
In addition, as we were checking and double checking facts, we had one official on one telephone line who told us that the young kid who was assaulted complained of a hurt back, but that it was minor and no medical care was needed, while an official on the other line, at the same time, told us that the kid wasn't hurt at all. Both officials apparently had the same information.
We believe the official who said the kid was hurt was truthful, because we also heard that from a second source. So, why did the other official try to tell us the kid wasn't hurt at all?
Now, we don't want to make too big a deal out of this, but we believe our schools should be violence free and that parents and community members should be told the whole truth about such incidents and not be given a run-a-round.
When the safety of our children is at stake, we'd rather err on the side of caution.
# # #
Those are our opinions. Thanks for reading them.
# # #
Bullyingwarrior and Bullying From Top School Officials have
CM Press did a great
Job uncovering this story on NMUSD.
Here's our link to bookmark for frequent visits: http://cmpress.blogspot.com/
-30-
AT 1:47 PM
LABELS: ASSAULT ON DAVIS CAMPUS
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2007
CM PRESS # 109
CM PRESS # 110
ASSAULT ON DAVIS CAMPUS
The CM PRESS received a report yesterday (3/21) that a fifth or sixth grader on the Davis School campus was the victim of an unprovoked assault by at least three older, and bigger, High School students who appeared to have entered the campus from Costa Mesa High School and who, for no reason, attacked the younger and smaller kid and left him on the ground. Davis is a 4th grade to 6th grade school so the kids there are from about 9 to 12 years old.
The incident is reported to have happened between about 2:50 and 3:00 p.m. when school was out and the City of Costa Mesa was running its after school program on the campus.
Information is sketchy and the CM PRESS seems to be getting a run-a-round from authorities, but it appears that the attackers have not been apprehended.
At this time, the CM PRESS does not know if the attackers were gang members or not, but we do know that Davis School has often had gang graffiti painted on the buildings and that this graffiti is quickly painted over by staff.
We are also concerned that the so-called intervention (as opposed to enforcement) strategy of some in local government and the NMUSD may be putting kids in danger because the interventionists may want to hide or downplay the reality of assaults and gang activity in order to calm fears of parents while at the same time furthering the interventionists' incorrect strategy of looking the other way when "minor assaults" and crimes take place so that the interventionists can befriend gang members, instead of having them arrested, in order to try to talk them out of being in gangs.
Our feeling that someone may be trying to cover this up wasn't assuaged when, as we were gathering information on this story, one official apparently tried to just have us go away by giving us an oil on troubled waters statement that the school was aware of the incident and that it was all taken care of (read, "It was no big deal. Hardly worth talking about").
When we persisted in our questions and demanded that we be told what was actually done, we were put on hold. The same person then came back on the line a few minutes later and told us that the "incident was under investigation." So, which is it? Is it no big deal or a big deal that requires investigation? Your guess is as good as ours.
In addition, as we were checking and double checking facts, we had one official on one telephone line who told us that the young kid who was assaulted complained of a hurt back, but that it was minor and no medical care was needed, while an official on the other line, at the same time, told us that the kid wasn't hurt at all. Both officials apparently had the same information.
We believe the official who said the kid was hurt was truthful, because we also heard that from a second source. So, why did the other official try to tell us the kid wasn't hurt at all?
Now, we don't want to make too big a deal out of this, but we believe our schools should be violence free and that parents and community members should be told the whole truth about such incidents and not be given a run-a-round.
When the safety of our children is at stake, we'd rather err on the side of caution.
# # #
Those are our opinions. Thanks for reading them.
# # #
Here's our link to bookmark for frequent visits: http://cmpress.blogspot.com/
-30-
AT 1:47 PM
LABELS: ASSAULT ON DAVIS CAMPUS
WEDNESDAY, MARCH 21, 2007
CM PRESS # 109
No comments:
Post a Comment
Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.