CONGRESS HEARING ABOUT NMUSD BULLYING FROM TOP SCHOOL OFFICIALS.

Message Confirmation

Confirmation Confirmed! Your letter has been sent. Thank you for using Congress.org to contact your elected officials. Want to stay involved? Find how YOUR Members voted. Click here to sign up for a free weekly e-mail that tells you how your Member of Congress voted. Follow YOUR state's news on Facebook. Click here to "like" your state and get the news about your lawmakers on Facebook. Other options from our partner sites: Want to read what Washington reads? Sign up for the CQ Roll Call Daily Briefing. Need political news fast? Sign up for Taegan Goddard's Political Wire. Become a fan of Congress.org on Facebook or follow us on Twitter. Your message was sent to:  President Barack Obama (D)  Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA)  Sign up for this official's e-newsletter.  Senator Dianne Feinstein (D-CA)  Sign up for this official's e-newsletter.  Representative Dana Rohrabacher (R-CA 48th)

FREE CHILD CARE TO ONE PUBLIC SCHOOL 5TH GRADE TEACHER ONLY AT NEWPORT HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL IN NEWPORT BEACH, CA.

NMUSD COMMUNITY AND KIMBERLY ARE ASKING FOR HELP, ACCOUNTABILITY TO UNDERSTAND HOW THIS WAS ALLOWED AND WHY NOBODY HELPED A CHILD AND FAMILY REPORTING EVERYTHING ACCORDING TO PROTOCOL. 

HOW CAN A TEACHER BE ABLE TO BRING HER BABY/TODDLER ONTO CAMPUS AT NEWPORT HEIGHTS ELEMENTARY FOR MONTHS AND INTO THE CLASSROOM WHILE TEACHING. 

TEACHERS, STAFF, FAMILIES AND TEACHERS STUDENTS COULD NOT UNDERSTAND HOW SPECIAL PRIVILEGES WERE GIVEN FOR MONTHS BACK IN 2010/2011.

HOW COULD SCHOOL OFFICIALS ALLOW TEACHER TO VIOLATE A SCHOOL POLICY KNOWN TO SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE, DEPT. OF EDUCATION AND CA. TEACHERS CREDENTIALING COMMISSION MONTHS PRIOR AND AFTER? 

DID THE RETALIATION FROM THE TEACHER, PRINCIPAL AT THE TIME, AND OTHERS NOT MATTER TO HARM A CHILD? 

WHY WOULD ANY SCHOOL OFFICIALS JOIN IN ON THE BULLYING, INTIMIDATION, FALSE BLAME, DEGRADING WORDS TO HUMILIATE A CHILD AND UNSAFE ACTIONS AND CONTINUED BIAS TREATMENT, UNEQUAL EDUCATION AND MUCH MORE? 

WHY WOULD A PRINCIPAL BREAK CONFIDENTIAL INFORMATION AND TELL THE TEACHER IT WAS A PARENT IN CLASS WHO ASKED ABOUT THE SCHOOL VIOLATION BEING BROKEN?

WHY WOULD THE TEACHER GO INTO HER CLASS AND ANNOUNCE TO STUDENTS SHE WAS UPSET WITH A PARENT OF A CHILD IN HER CLASS THAT SHE COULD NOT BRING HER OWN CHILD INTO CLASS ANYMORE WHILE TEACHING?

WHY WOULD THE PRINCIPAL ALLOW A TEACHER TO SHOW UP LATE NUMEROUS TIMES, OTHER STAFF WOULD COVER FOR THEM AND THEN HAVE TO GO BACK TO THEIR OWN CLASS TO TEACH OR JOB AND THE 5TH GRADE STUDENTS WERE LEFT ALONE NOT SUPERVISED? 

THE TEACHER ENCOURAGED KEEPING SECRETS ABOUT THIS AND OTHER THINGS IN HER CLASS. NO ADULT SHOULD EVER ENCOURAGE HIDING ANYTHING FROM THEIR PARENTS!

DID IT SIMPLY NOT MATTER TO THESE EMPLOYEES? COULD IT HAVE BEEN THEY FELT THEY DID NOT HAVE TO FOLLOW THEIR OWN RULES? DID THEY NOT THINK OTHER PEOPLE WOULD NOT NOTICE THE TREATMENT AND BEING A BULLY TO THIS CHILD?

IN OUR SCHOOL SYSTEM THERE ARE MANY VICTIMS NOT PROTECTED BY SCHOOL OFFICIALS, BUT THE HIDDEN AND RARELY DISCUSSED TOPIC IS THE DAMAGE, TRUST SEVERED AND SCARS THESE PEOPLE LEAVE BEHIND BY "BULLYING FROM TOP SCHOOL OFFICIALS”.

IS IT NOT A VIOLATION OR BREAKING PENAL CODES WHEN A SCHOOL OFFICIAL KNOWS THIS IS DONE AND DOES NOTHING TO STOP THE TREATMENT AND RETALIATION DONE TO THE STUDENT AND FAMILY?

WHY WOULD A FRONT OFFICE EMPLOYEE TAKE A TEACHERS CHILD BACK AND FORTH THROUGHOUT CAMPUS? 
WHY WOULD THIS EMPLOYEE LEAVE HER FRONT JOB MANY TIMES AND JOIN IN ON RETALIATION TO FAMILY WHO REPORTED THIS CONFIDENTIALLY TO THE PAST PRINCIPAL?  

WHY WOULD THE SCHOOL VIOLATION BE COVERED UP ALL THE WAY UP TO THE CHAIN OF COMMAND TO THE NOW PAST CONVICTED SUPERINTENDENT, JEFFREY HUBBARD AND OTHER SCHOOL LEADERS IN DISTRICT, EVEN KNOWN TO ALL THE BOARD MEMBERS, DEPT. OF EDUCATION IN SACRAMENTO, ORANGE COUNTY OFFICE AND EVEN CA. TEACHERS CREDENTIALING?

WHY WOULD THIS SUPERINTENDENT SUPPORT SUSAN ASTARITA ON 
9-12-11, BEFORE HIS BHUSD TRIAL, ALLOWING A CLAIM DENIAL WITH A SCHOOL VIOLATION, NOW ALLOW TEACHER TO BRING HER CHILD ONTO CAMPUS AND IT WAS MORE BENEFICIAL TO HER STUDENTS? IS IT NOT CONTRADICTING TO CHANGE THE SCHOOL POLICIES THAT HAVE ALREADY BEEN WRITTEN TO FOLLOW AND ENFORCE?  

WHY WOULD SUSAN ASTARITA, DEPT. OF EDUCATION, PAST PRINCIPAL NOT HAVE JUST SAID IT WAS NOW ALLOWED WHEN IT WAS STATED THAT IT WAS AGAINST SCHOOL POLICY AND IT WAS VIOLATING THEIR OWN RULES? 

INTERESTING THAT SUSAN WAS AWARE OF THIS VIOLATION MONTHS EARLIER ON 3-30-11.

IT IS CONFUSING TO MANY PEOPLE, THAT THE NMUSD WOULD BE ALLOWED TO VIOLATE THEIR OWN POLICIES AND SUPPORT AN UNEQUAL EDUCATION, PROVIDE A UNSAFE SCHOOL ENVIRONMENT AND THEN REWARD AND GIVE PROMOTIONS TO THE EMPLOYEES NOT PROTECTING THE CHILD AND FAMILY EVEN WORKING NEW POSITIONS IN THE SUPERINTENDENTS OFFICE. 

WHY WAS THERE NO ACCOUNTABILITY FROM BULLYING TO A CHILD FROM TOP SCHOOL OFFICIALS AND THEN GO BACK TO COVER UP ACTIONS AND VIOLATE THEIR OWN RULES, POLICIES, HANDBOOK PROCEDURES OR JUST TREAT A CHILD WITH DIGNITY AND RESPECT.